Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05915
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05830
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv00887
Plaintiff:
Suzanne E. Smith and Todd Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Standard Oil Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv04605
Defendant:
Standard Oil Company, Inc. d/b/a Standard Oil Company Of West Virginia, Inc., Mary Zingale, Robert German and others
Plaintiff:
James E Smith and James E Smith, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Harry Nguyen, M.D., HPR Clinic, LLC and Ryan Fryman, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Betty E Smith and Betty E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 2:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Woolace Electric Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv02578
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith and Menno Schwartz, Jr.
Defendant:
Woolace Electric Corp. , Steven Garza and Cory McManues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
