Cases 1 - 10 of 68
(PC) Harris v. Ceballos
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Earnest S. Harris
Defendant:
I. Ceballos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Woodruff v. The White House et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Earnest Tomboura Woodruff
Defendant:
The White House, United States Secret Service, Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Woodruff v. Elers et al
as 2:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Earnest T. Woodruff and Earnest Tomboura Woodruff
Defendant:
Elers, Warden, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Dillihunt v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Victoria T. Dillihunt
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Unknown
as 5:2022cv02801
Petitioner:
Vincent Earnest Sanchez
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarred Tyler Earnest v. San Bernardino County
as 5:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Jarred Tyler Earnest
Respondent:
San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Earnest C. Woods
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jarred Tyler Earnest v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jarred Tyler Earnest
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harris v. Munoz et al
as 2:2021cv02303
Plaintiff:
Earnest S. Harris
Defendant:
E. Munoz, S. Arrequin, N. Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
