Cases 1 - 10 of 27
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Respondent:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie McCay, III
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCay v. Sipes et al
as 5:2023cv01102
Defendant:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCay, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Lee Earnest Price, III
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
Earnest Joe Fields
Defendant:
Lucas Temple, J Jamgochian and City of Tulsa, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moncada v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00779
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Oklahoma State of and others
Petitioner:
Earnest Moncada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hines v. Allbaugh et al
as 6:2019cv00215
Respondent:
FNU A Proctor, FNU Epperlley, FNU D Berry and others
Defendant:
Glenn Robinson, FNU A Perez, Willa Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman Harvey Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Allbaugh et al
as 5:2019cv00529
Defendant:
FNU Peltier, Glenn Robinson, FNU A Proctor and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman Harvey Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padillow v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2018cv00122
Petitioner:
Earnest Eugene Padillow
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Bear et al
as 5:2017cv00216
Petitioner:
Danny R Campbell
Respondent:
Carl Bear, Ernest Wilson, Kurk Earnest Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
