Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
David F. Welch
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar v. Westchester Parkway Consulting LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00533
Defendant:
PGN MGMT Oak LLC, PGN OP Summit LLC, John Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
James Edgar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burgett v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
Echo T. Burgett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rankin et al v. Echo 24, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rankin and Joseph Freitas, Jr.
Defendant:
Echo 24, Inc. and Anthony J Gunter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
StoneEagle Services, Inc. v. Pay-Plus Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mc00010
Plaintiff:
StoneEagle Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Pay-Plus Solutions, Inc. and Premier Health Care Exchange, Inc.
Interested_party:
ECHO Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
totes Isotoner Corporation v. Echo Design Group, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
totes Isotoner Corporation
Defendant:
Echo Design Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Echo Health, Inc. v. NexPay, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
Echo Health, Inc.
Defendant:
NexPay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
StoneEagle Services, Inc. v. Gillman et al
as 1:2013mc00012
Plaintiff:
StoneEagle Services, Inc.
Defendant:
David Gillman and Talon Transaction Technologies, Inc.
Movant:
ECHO Health, Inc.
Echo Global Logistics, Inc. v. RSL-Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
RSL-Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
