Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 85
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant: CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Counter Defendant: GRINNELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOORE et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv78928
Plaintiff: WILLIS MOORE and MARY L. MOORE
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , TRANE US INC , BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC
Cross_defendant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC , BIRD INC , BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAMMIT et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61112
Plaintiff: JOSEPH V ZAMMIT , RUTH E ZAMMIT and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC , DURO-DYNE CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY and OWENS-ILLINOIS INC
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC
Cross_claimant: OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY , OWENS-ILLINOIS INC , RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Cross_defendant: CBS CORPORATION , DURO-DYNE CORPORATION , ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APICELLA et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv60275
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J. APICELLA and RUTH APICELLA
Defendant: AC&S INC, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CHARLES et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING C et al
as 2:2010cv60287
Plaintiff: ROBERT B. CHARLES and PAMELA CHARLES
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING C, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: GAF CORP, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PLACE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv60266
Plaintiff: ARTHUR PLACE and LORRAINE PLACE
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANIVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARBLE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS et al
as 2:2010cv60260
Plaintiff: JOHN MARBLE and JUDY MARBLE
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS and others
ThirdParty Defendant: EASTERN REFRACTORIES, EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CROTEAU et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING C et al
as 2:2010cv60265
Plaintiff: DENNIS J CROTEAU and CYNTHIA CROTEAU
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING C, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DATE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING C et al
as 2:2010cv60273
Plaintiff: DUANE A DATE and SUSAN DATE
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING C, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLETTE v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2010cv60271
Plaintiff: ROBERT E MILLETTE
Defendant: OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING C, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?