Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Gregor (PS) v. Community Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Respondent:
Community Corrections, Independence House, Arlene Duram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregor (PS) v. Indenpendence-House- Community Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01922
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
Indenpendence-House- Community Corrections, Jen, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craine v. Caley at al
as 1:2023cv01081
Petitioner:
David Craine
Respondent:
Ed Caley, Eddie Caley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Petitioner:
Damian Betebenner, Cigdem Betebenner and Chris Dobson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Clifton v. Willis et al
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clifton
Defendant:
Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Robledo v. Colorado Inmate Bank et al
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Colorado Inmate Bank, C. Alloy, Tonya Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Caley
as 1:2021cv02808
Petitioner:
Marcus R. Reid
Respondent:
Ed Caley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. Caley
as 1:2021cv01700
Petitioner:
Mark A. Sanders
Respondent:
Ed Caley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Hoppe v. Caley
as 1:2021cv00898
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Hoppe
Respondent:
Ed Caley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
