Cases 1 - 10 of 1,086
Eizner v. Dominic Andre Inc.
as 0:2024cv60828
Plaintiff:
Eddie Eizner
Defendant:
Dominic Andre Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Eizner v. Dominic Andre Inc.
as 0:2024cv60824
Plaintiff:
Mr. Eddie Eizner
Defendant:
Dominic Andre Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Eizner v. Dominic Andre Inc.
as 0:2024cv60787
Plaintiff:
Eddie Eizner
Defendant:
Dominic Andre Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Eizner v. Dominic Andre,Inc.
as 0:2024cv60777
Plaintiff:
Eddie Eizner
Defendant:
Dominic Andre,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Arevalo et al v. Eddy O. Marban, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv21689
Plaintiff:
Noris Arevalo, Juan Arevalo Villalobos, Tomas Avendano and others
Defendant:
Eddy O. Marban, P.A., Dammous Law PLLC., Edilberto O. Marban and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simmons et al v. Grass Roots Complete LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60723
Plaintiff:
Eddie Leonard Simmons and Sammie Lee Smith
Defendant:
Grass Roots Complete LLC and Daniel Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Moultrie v. Minshew et al
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Moultrie
Defendant:
J. Minshew, Christina Crews, A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Ocala Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Eddie Scott
Defendant:
Ocala Police Department, Crystal Blanton and Marion County Fifth Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
EDDIE D STARKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
