Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Eten et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2012cv11262
Plaintiff:
Vivian Eten and Bret Eten
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanchard v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2012cv11263
Plaintiff:
TERESA BLANCHARD
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coman et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2012cv11267
Plaintiff:
Helen Coman and James Coman, Jr
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royall v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2012cv11268
Plaintiff:
Patricia Royall
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2012cv11269
Plaintiff:
Ellen Sparks
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2012cv11260
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jones and Tom Jones
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rolinski et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2012cv11259
Plaintiff:
Barbara Rolinksi and Nissar Taiibi
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dostert v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2012cv11265
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN DOSTERT
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv10152
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO , STEPHEN FECHO , ANDREA ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEELER et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2010cv10666
Plaintiff:
MARY KEELER , THOMAS KEELER , ALYSSA ALBERTELLI and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
