Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ellis v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ellis
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SONDESKY v. ELLIS
as 2:2017cv04280
Plaintiff:
LINDA SONDESKY
Defendant:
STEPHEN EDWARD ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SONDESKY v. CHERRY SCAFFOLDING INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05667
Plaintiff:
LINDA SONDESKY
Defendant:
CHERRY SCAFFOLDING INC. and STEPHEN ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANNON v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv01411
Plaintiff:
ELLIS G. CANNON
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ELLIS v. OML ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05841
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ELLIS
Defendant:
OML ENTERPRISES, INC., STEPHEN LEE and MDXCEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ELLIS v. SEARS HOMETOWN AND OUTLET STORES, INC.
as 2:2014cv04279
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIS
Defendant:
SEARS HOMETOWN AND OUTLET STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ELLIS v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
as 2:2013cv04409
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ELLIS
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
BROWNSON v. NELLO CONSTRUCTION CO.
as 2:2013cv02508
Plaintiff:
ELLIS BROWNSON, III
Defendant:
NELLO CONSTRUCTION CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ELLIS v. CROSSMARK, INC.
as 2:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
RICKY ELLIS
Defendant:
CROSSMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALLEN et al v. CHICAGO STEEL (PA), LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01931
Plaintiff:
TIM ALLEN , DAVE BERGNER , TIM BUSHEY and others
Defendant:
CHICAGO STEEL (PA), LLC , CHICAGO STEEL AND TINPLATE PROCESSING, INC. , CHICAGO STEEL AND TINPLATE, INC. CHICAGO STEEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
