Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Aycock v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2287
Petitioner:
DEVONTAY AYCOCK
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, JEREMY BEAN, substituted for Ely State Prison per #56 Order and others
Harris v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2265
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, W. A. GITTERE and others
Benavide v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-1923
Petitioner:
CRISTOBAL BENAVIDE
Respondent:
W. A. GITTERE, Warden of Ely State Prison, FAC 25, BRIAN WILLIAMS, FAC 25, JAMES DZURENDA, Director of Nevada Department of Corrections, FAC 25 and others
White v. Israel et al
as 2:2026cv00855
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee White
Defendant:
Ronald J Israel, Nancy Bernstien and Ely State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2026cv00175
Plaintiff:
Abraham Clifton Simpson
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, NDOC Inspector Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Boyd, et al.
as 25-6494
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
JOSHUA BOYD, ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2025cv01736
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, City of Ely, County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ely State Prison, et al.
as 25-4803
Plaintiff:
KELVIN LANEIL JAMES
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON, R. DUGAN and BALTIERRA
James v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2025cv00502
Plaintiff:
Kelvin L. James
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, R. Dugan and Baltierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Dzurenda
as 2:2025cv00270
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden, Associate Wardens at HDSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
