Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Josue Romero, et al v. Provide Commerce, Inc., et al
as 16-56307
:
In re: EASYSAVER REWARDS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSUE ROMERO, DEANNA HUNT, KIMBERLY KENYON and others
Objector - Appellant:
BRIAN PERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDE COMMERCE, INC., REGENT GROUP, INC., a California corporation, DBA Encore Marketing International and ENCORE MARKETING INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Josue Romero, et al v. Brian Pettyman, et al
as 13-55373
:
In re: EASYSAVER REWARDS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSUE ROMERO, DEANNA HUNT, KIMBERLY KENYON and others
Objector - Appellant:
BRIAN PERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDE COMMERCE, INC., REGENT GROUP, INC., a California corporation, DBA Encore Marketing International and ENCORE MARKETING INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al v. Encore Marketing International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00620
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company , Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
Defendant:
Encore Marketing International, Inc., Regent Group Inc., Provide Commerce Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERBST v. ENCORE MARKETING INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00870
Plaintiff:
ALISSA HERBST
Defendant:
ENCORE MARKETING INTERNATIONAL INC., EASYSAVER REWARDS, PROVIDE COMMERCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Romero v. Provide Commerce, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02111
Plaintiff:
Josue Romero
Defendant:
Provide Commerce, Inc., Regent Group, Inc., Encore Marketing International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
In Re: Easysaver Rewards Litigation
as 3:2009cv02094
Defendant:
Doe Defendants A - Z, Encore Marketing International, Inc., Provide Commerce, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Jenkins, Jennifer Lawler, Bradley Berentson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
