Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Federal Trade Commission v. Success By Media Holdings Inc., et al.
as 23-3781
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INC., a corporation doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA, LLC, a limited liability company doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL and others
Defendant:
RINPARK SA, NETFORCE SEMINARS, RICHARD SLABACK and others
Not Yet Classified:
LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC also known as Scott Harris, THOMAS G SACCA, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC also known as Thomas Socca and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELANIE SUMMERS, ROBERT MEHLER, JO DEE BAER and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, et al.
as 23-3757
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INC., a corporation doing business as Success By Health, doing business as Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA, LLC, a limited liability company doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL and others
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES D NOLAND, JR., individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC, LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC and others
FTC v. James Noland, Jr., et al
as 21-16679
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES D. NOLAND, Jr., individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC, AKA Jay Noland, AKA JD Noland, LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A. HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC and others
Defendant:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA LLC, a limited liability company, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL FUNDING and others
FTC v. James Noland, Jr., et al
as 21-15767
Petitioner / Appellant:
TEVIS SHERFIELD, JILL BOONE, DWAYNE HOSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA LLC, a limited liability company, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL FUNDING, SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media and others
FTC v. James Noland, Jr., et al
as 20-17324
Defendant:
ENHANCED CAPITAL FUNDING, RINPARK SA, SUCCESS BY MEDIA LLC, a limited liability company, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT A. HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC, THOMAS G. SACCA, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC, JAMES D. NOLAND, Jr., individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC, AKA Jay Noland, AKA JD Noland and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Receiver:
KIMBERLY FRIDAY
Enhanced Capital HTC FundI, LLC et al v. Duckett
as 2:2019cv11324
Defendant:
Brandon Duckett and Osipov Bigelman, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Enhanced Capital HTC FundI, LLC and 678 Selden, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund et al v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08464
Plaintiff:
BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund , BlackRock Allocation Target Shares: Series C Portfolio , Blackrock Allocation Target Shares: Series S Portfolio and others
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., ARC Properties Operating Partnership, L.P., AR Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
