Cases 1 - 10 of 117
LEFFEBRE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00748
Petitioner:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
RIASCOS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
NIVALDO RIASCOS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HANOVER COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
HANOVER COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
DEL ROSARIO v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAMOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
RAUL C. RAMOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARMOLEJOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MARMOLEJOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP, INC. v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
