Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Luketic v. Estes Express Lines et al.
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Nick Luketic
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines and Jake Vatavuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Emmer-Lovell v. Estes Express Lines et al
as 1:2020cv02479
Defendant:
David Mangrum, Estes Express Lines, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Emmer-Lovell and Jay Emmer-Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gargas v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00590
Plaintiff:
Robert Gargas and Robert J. Gargas
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Schauf v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. d/b/a Estes Suremove
as 3:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kara Schauf
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc. d/b/a Estes Suremove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sizemore v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00792
Plaintiff:
Gordon D. Sizemore
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lyons v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
John D. Lyons
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Inc. and Mitchel R. Fishel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Michigan Insurance Company v. Kendall M. Ray, et al.
as 3:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Progressive Michigan Insurance Company
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines and Kendall M. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Estes Express Lines et al
as 3:2014cv01782
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines and Kendall Ray
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogge v. Estes Express Lines et al
as 3:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rogge
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines and Kendall Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Wheeler et al v. Estes Express Lines et al
as 3:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Willard Wheeler and Terrolyn Campbell-Wheeler
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines and Kendall Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
