Cases 51 - 60 of 606
Crapo v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Adam Scott Crapo
Respondent:
City of Brownsville and Cameron County, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Fourth Court of Appeals, et al
as 5:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Fourth Court of Appeals, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
as 5:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Albright, et al.
as 5:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Albright, et al.
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. O'connell, et al et al
as 5:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Terrance Fletcher
Defendant:
Detective Timothy O'connell, et al, Reporting Officer Alfred Cruz, Detective J Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00978
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Mr. FNU Plunk, Warden I, II, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. McBride, et al.
as 5:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Lowell Q. Green
Defendant:
Judge John McBride, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Donna L. Mendez, et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Donna L. Mendez, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luevano v. State of Texas, et al.
as 5:2023cv00903
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
State of Texas, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
