Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Belhaven Shipyard & Marina, Inc. v. VANISH, a 2021 Silent Yacht 60 motor yacht (Official # 1327819), and its motors, contents and appurtenances, etc. et al
as 1:2023cv11690
Plaintiff:
Belhaven Shipyard & Marina, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
National Maritime Services, Inc.
Defendant:
VANISH, a 2021 Silent Yacht 60 motor yacht (Official # 1327819), and its motors, contents and appurtenances, etc. and Vanish Marine Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
ING Bank N.V. v. M/V EMERALD STRAIT, IMO No. 9488592, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem
as 1:2016cv10368
Plaintiff:
ING Bank N.V.
Defendant:
M/V EMERALD STRAIT, IMO No. 9488592, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Maroc Fruit Board, S.A. et al v. M/V Almeda Star, et al
as 1:2011cv12091
Plaintiff:
Maroc Fruit Board, S.A. and Wafa Assurance, S.A.
Defendant:
M/V Almeda Star, Her Engines, Machinery, Tackle, Apparel, Appurtenances, etc., in rem, and Star Reefers Shipowning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC v. Dredge Vessel 'ATCHAFALAYA" Her engines, rigging, equipment and appurtenances, etc. In Rem
as 1:2010cv12220
Plaintiff:
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC
Defendant:
Dredge Vessel 'ATCHAFALAYA" Her engines, rigging, equipment and appurtenances, etc. In Rem , Sterling Equipment, Inc. , Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC , Sterling Equipment, Inc. , Cashman Dredging International, LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Rosado v. ETC Service Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv30048
Defendant:
ETC Service Solutions, Inc. and Joshua Soroko
Plaintiff:
James Rosado
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
