Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Evans et al v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission et al
as 4:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
David M. Evans , Sage Builders and Ron Pickens
Defendant:
Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission, Nathan Small, Glenn Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Evans et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Gary D Evans and Kristy K Evans
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laird v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laird
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Brent Reinke, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Noble Banks
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Renae LP James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Sonnen
as 1:2011cv00282
Petitioner:
Steven Rae Evans
Respondent:
Pam Sonnen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolf v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O-Kel-ly v. Schlienz et al
as 1:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra O-Kell-ly
Defendant:
Rodney W Schlienz, Pam Sonnen, Jeffrey Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans et al v. Avista Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
William J Evans , WJ Enterprises and Melony Evans
Defendant:
Avista Corporation and Avista Utilities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams, et al v. USA
as 4:2003cv00049
Plaintiff:
Timm Adams , Barbara Adams , Arrow Head Potato Co and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
