Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03634
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HUMMEL v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. et al
as 5:2021cv01652
Defendant: EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff: DENNIS HUMMEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv06085
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ACOSTA v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
as 5:2017mc00179
Petitioner: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Respondent: EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv06484
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
STONE v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO.
as 5:2016cv00714
Plaintiff: TODD STONE
Defendant: EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?