Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vizcayno v. Medina et al
as 7:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
Sgt. Lydia Long Medina and Sgt. Arnie R. Juala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vizcayno v. McMiller et al
as 7:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Respondent:
Cpt Cody McMiller, Timothy Hooper, Kira Tysinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vizcayno v. Rushing
as 7:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
Sgt. Katherine Rushing, Sgt. Nicki Vaquez and Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vizcayno v. Rushing
as 7:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Respondent:
Sgt Katherine Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vizcayno v. State of Texas
as 7:2022cv00027
Petitioner:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vizcayno v. STATE OF TEXAS
as 7:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vizcayno v. Doe 7:21-CV-105-O
as 7:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
John Doe 7:21-CV-105-O, Sgt. Brice Byrd, C.O. Alejo Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vizcayno v. Martinez et al
as 7:2020cv00163
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
David Varaccarela, Sergio Martinez, Kyle Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vizcayno v. Eastridge
as 7:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Joseph Eastridge
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vizcayno v. Lozada et al
as 7:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Vizcayno and Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
Keith L. Grantom, Traci R Cooke, Andrea B Lozada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
