Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00946
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00721
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00571
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00555
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Finkel v. Universal Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07401
Plaintiff: Dr. Gerald Finkel
Defendant: Theodore Meshover, Edward Newman and Universal Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00554
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Almanzar v. Phillips et al
as 1:2012cv01215
Petitioner: Ramon Diaz Almanzar
Respondent: Michael T. Phillips, Edward Newman, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Almanzar v. Phillips et al
as 9:2012cv01764
Petitioner: Ramon Diaz Almanzar
Respondent: Michael T. Phillips, Edward Newman, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Finkel v. Universal Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02078
Plaintiff: Dr. Gerald Finkel
Defendant: Theodore Meshover, Edward Newman and Universal Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?