Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kishinevski v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Anatoly Kishinevski
Defendant:
Nicholas J Deml, Jeff Percy, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Sanders et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
D M Hart, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Sanders et al
as 2:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Michael Atkinson, Bernie Sanders, Bill Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Rudavsky v. City of South Burlington et al
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rudavsky
Defendant:
South Burlington, City of , Christopher Bataille , Patrick Mulcahy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watkins v. Capital City Bank et al
as 5:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Geneva L. Watkins
Defendant:
Capital City Bank , Wallace E. Miller , Samuel Hilbun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gauthier et al v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Gauthier and Edward Gauthier
Defendant:
Troy Kirkpatrick, Barre Vermont, Weiland Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finley v. Hersh et al
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Edward Finley
Defendant:
John Hersh, Leonard Shapiro and Ray LaMoria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maunsell v. Cashman et al
as 5:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Francis Maunsell
Defendant:
Edward J. Cashman, Edward M. Kenney, Rosemary Gretkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Pannu et al
as 5:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Darren Brady
Defendant:
Jasdeep Singh Pannu, Edward J. Cashman, Stacie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coutu v. Town of Cavendish et al
as 2:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
David Coutu
Defendant:
Cavendish, the Town of, Richard F. Svec, George Timko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
