Cases 1 - 10 of 125
LANG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
EDWARD JACOB LANG
Not Yet Classified:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and HERIBERTO TELLEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
EDWARDS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
GEZO GOEONG EDWARDS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARACHA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02567
Petitioner:
MR. SAIFULLAH PARACHA and SAIFULLAH PARACHA
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Hon. ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and Adm. EDWARD B. CASHMAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Respondent:
MICHAEL N. BATES, RALSTON D. MARSHALL and BALDEN B. POLK
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAM v. USA
as 1:2020cv01657
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
EDWARD L. WILLIAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SNIPES v. CHUTKAN et al
as 1:2020cv01477
Defendant:
JANE DOES, TANYA S. CHUTKAN, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
LEON SNIPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. BOOTH et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS, ERIC SMITH, D'ANGELO PHILLIPS and others
Petitioner:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LABOR COMMITTEE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAY JR. v. HASKETT et al
as 1:2020cv00806
Defendant:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, GENARO GARCIA LUNA, PATRICIA ESPINOZA CANTELLANO and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHARLES DAY JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH BEY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2020cv00380
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD SMITH BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03614
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
