Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Chao v. Martin et al
as 2:2008cv02700
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Frank H. Martin and Cardiovascular Specialist, P.C. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States Enrichment Corpo v. Hilda S. Solis, et al
as 08-4335
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION
Intervenor:
GARY JOE PIERCE
Respondent:
GARY JOE PIERCE, ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary, Department of Labor and HILDA S. SOLIS
Chao v. First Primary Mortgage et al
as 1:2008cv02245
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
First Primary Mortgage, Sammy Quick and First Primary Mortgage 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Elaine Chao v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp
as 08-4176
Petitioner:
ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION
Mark Hoffman v. Hilda S. Solis
as 08-4128
Petitioner:
MARK J. HOFFMAN
Respondent:
ELAINE L. CHAO and HILDA S. SOLIS, U.S. Secretary of Labor
Chao v. Cleveland Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02085
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Cleveland Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. and Michael Sirna
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Harry Smith v. Hilda S. Solis
as 08-4058
Petitioner:
HARRY SMITH
Intervenor:
CRST INTERNATIONAL, INC. and LAKE CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Respondent:
ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor and HILDA S. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor
Chao v. The Whitestone Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00660
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
The Whitestone Group, Inc. and John D. Clark, Sr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Chao v. Traylor
as 3:2008cv00607
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao, Elaine L. Chao and Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
William Traylor
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
