Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Elizabeth Grace Alexander v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2026cv01848
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Grace Alexander
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Duffy v. Ally et al
as 3:2026cv00393
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Duffy
Defendant:
Shahabuddeen A. Ally and Chidi A. Eze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2026cv01270
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Spencer
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Corletto v. Blondheim et al
as 3:2026cv00238
Defendant:
Elizabeth Blondheim, Bryce Shields, Robert DeLong and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Corletto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winkler v. Tate et al
as 2:2026cv00990
Plaintiff:
Geoff Winkler
Defendant:
Dian S. Tate, John Eric Salisbury, Willam Perri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Avakian v. CSAA Insurance Exchange
as 2:2026cv00902
Defendant:
CSAA Insurance Exchange
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elizabeth Avakian
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Visconti v. Jones
as 2:2026cv00291
Plaintiff:
Lala Maha Visconti
Defendant:
Elizabeth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Gatus et al
as 2:2026cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Defendant:
Detective Justine Gatus, Detective Mark Amundson, Detective Zack Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
