Cases 1 - 10 of 3,016
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Waterman et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04881
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Waterman and NY Black and Gold Corporation
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 3:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah and Autodesk, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Anagnost, Karen Blasing, Reid French and others
Lamasters v. Geico Indemnity Company et al
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Lamasters
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company and Does 1 through 30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Perez et al v. Rose Hills Company
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perez
Petitioner:
Rose Hills Mortuary, L.P.
Defendant:
Rose Hills Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Perez v. Rose Hills Mortuary, LLP et al
as 2:2024cv04824
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perez
Defendant:
Rose Hills Mortuary, LLP and Rose Hills Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Waterman v. TikTok Inc.
as 2:2024cv04802
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Waterman
Defendant:
TikTok Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Miraglia v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
as 3:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miraglia
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
