Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Cuevas et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2019cv00504
Plaintiff:
Alcibiades Birruete, Santos Cuevas, Mickey Rolin and others
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum, Justices of Supreme Court of Oregon, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 5:2018cv03260
Petitioner:
Reginald Marcel Johnson
Respondent:
Ellen Rosenblum and Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dontay Crawford v. Ellen Rosenblum
as 18-35505
Petitioner - Appellee:
DONTAY JAMES CRAWFORD
Respondent - Appellant:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Oregon Attorney General
Enriquez et al v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
36 Oregon Counties as Municipal Corporations, All Oregon District Attorneys for the 36 Oregon Counties, Ellen Rosenblum and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Enriquez and Estimated 19,800 Similarly Situated Persons
Movant:
Donald Terrill and Shaun A. Toman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doty v. Rosenblum
as 3:2018cv00894
Plaintiff:
Scott Lee Doty
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00301
Defendant:
Bob Gross, Guy Knight, Joshua Marque and others
Plaintiff:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sirgiorgio Clardy v. State of Oregon, et al
as 17-35594
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIRGIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and ELLEN ROSENBLUM
Howard v. Riley et al
as 2:2017cv01098
Defendant:
Frederick M. Boss, Chase Bank of Oregon, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crittenden Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Thomasson v. Ellen Rosenblum
as 17-35190
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMIAH THOMASSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM
David Gildersleeve v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 17-35077
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ERNEST GILDERSLEEVE
Respondent - Appellee:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
