Cases 1 - 8 of 8
IRWS, LLC v. Elmore County, et al.
as 24-345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRWS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ELMORE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION and others
Elmore County, Alabama et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45003
Plaintiff:
Elmore County, Alabama and Randolph County, Alabama
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shaquille Parker v. Elmore CF Warden, et al
as 20-14495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL FRANKLIN, Elmore County Sheriff and ELMORE CF WARDEN
Travis Dynarski v. Elmore County
as 20-70622
Respondent:
ELMORE COUNTY
Petitioner:
TRAVIS THOMAS DYNARSKI
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, et al
as 19-35391
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE RODRIGUEZ, Nez Perce County Sheriff, MATTHEW THOMAS, Sheriff, Sexual Offender Management Board, CRAIG T. ROWLAND, Bingham County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOES, John and Jane, 1-134
Adams County et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46062
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elmore County, Boise County, Latah County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams County et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00360
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elmore County, Boise County, Latah County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hispanic Interest Coalition of, et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 11-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HISPANIC INTEREST COALITION OF ALABAMA, AIDS ACTION COALITION, HUNTSVILLE INTERNATIONAL HELP CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
