Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shan v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv05167
Plaintiff:
Yuguang Shan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv04701
Plaintiff:
Zhiying Chen, Haiwen Pan and Yang Pan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hu et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv04599
Plaintiff:
Jianchao Hu, Liqun Guo and Xiao Hu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and Evelyn M. Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhao et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv04576
Plaintiff:
Chen Zhao and Gang Zhu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Li et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv03836
Plaintiff:
Jian Li and Ying Xue
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03664
Plaintiff:
Shu Fang Zheng
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Balkind v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02598
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Balkind
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Xu et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jianmin Xu, Jianmin Xu, Changzhi Zhu and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
Zheng Bin
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
