Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SCHOFIELD et al v. SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06562
Defendant:
Robert Arum, TODD DUBOEF, Home Box Office Inc and others
Plaintiff:
NYCOLE EVANS and JASON SCHOFIELD
Armando Villasenor v. Showtime Networks, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06567
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Home Box Office Inc, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Villasenor
Paul Brodsky et al v. Emmanuel D. Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv06575
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Todd Deboef, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Brodsky, Paul Goodman and Marcy Lokietz
Benjamin Scheffer v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06587
Respondent:
Robert Arum, MICHAEL KONCZ, Emmanuel D Pacquiao and others
Petitioner:
Benjamin Scheffer
John Assalian v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06557
Plaintiff:
John Assalian
Defendant:
Mayweather Promotions, LLC, Floyd Mayweather, Jr., Emmanuel D Pacquiao and others
Villasenor v. Showtime Networks, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
Armando Villasenor
Defendant:
Showtime Networks, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc. , Mayweather Promotions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Villasenor v. Showtime Networks, Inc. et al
as NM/1:00-cv-00641
Plaintiff:
Armando Villasenor
Defendant:
Showtime Networks, Inc. , Home Box Office, Inc. , Mayweather Promotions, LLC and others
SCHOFIELD et al v. SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04540
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHOFIELD and NYCOLE EVANS
Defendant:
SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC. , HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., MAYWEATHER PROMOTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwin Mendez v. Emmanuel D Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv03693
Plaintiff:
Edwin Mendez
Defendant:
Emmanuel D Pacquiao and Top Rank, Inc.
Brodsky et al v. Pacquiao et al
as 1:2015cv02709
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Todd Deboef, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Brodsky, Paul Goodman and Marcy Lokietz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
