Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Namecheap, Inc. v. Tucows, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01310
Plaintiff:
Namecheap Inc
Defendant:
Tucows Inc , Enom Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TVB Holdings USA Inc v. Enom Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00624
Defendant:
Does and Enom Inc
Plaintiff:
TVB Holdings USA Inc
Van Patten v. Black Lotus Communications et al
as 3:2012cv01450
Plaintiff:
Bradley Van Patten
Defendant:
Black Lotus Communications, eNom, Inc. and Open DNS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena S.A. de C.V. et al v. Stenli LTD et al
as 2:2010cv01000
Defendant:
Stenli LTD, Leigh Heggenhougen, Trond Heggenhougen and others
Plaintiff:
Tequila Cuervo La Rojens SA de CV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt Ltd v. Tata Sons Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv01261
Plaintiff:
MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt Ltd and MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt Ltd
Defendant:
Tata Sons Ltd and eNom Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
First American Corporation v. eNom Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00762
Plaintiff:
First American Corporation
Defendant:
eNom Inc, Lead Networks Domains Private Limited and Pluto Domain Services Private Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
eNom Inc v. Philbrick et al
as 2:2008cv01288
Plaintiff:
eNom Inc and eNom Inc
Defendant:
Daniel J Philbrick and Dover Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore et al v. ICANN Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 2:2008cv04480
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Ronald P Gentry
Defendant:
Enom, Inc., Enom, Inc., Enom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Consumer Lending Services, LLC v. eNom Inc
as 2:2008mc00073
Plaintiff:
Consumer Lending Services, LLC
Defendant:
eNom Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
