Cases
Food & Water Watch v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 22-6543
Petitioner: FOOD & WATER WATCH, RECIRCULATING FARMS COALITION, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Food & Water Watch v. Environmental Protection Agency
as 22-2957
Petitioner: Food & Water Watch, Recirculating Farms Coalition, Center for Food Safety and others
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Appeals Board
Food & Water Watch, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1253
Petitioner: Food & Water Watch, Recirculating Farms Coalition, Center for Food Safety and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Appeals Board
Peter Bormuth v. Environmental Appeals Board, et al
as 13-4411
Petitioner: PETER CARL BORMUTH
Respondent: ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD, TINKA G. HYDE, Director, Region 5 Water Division and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BORMUTH v. ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD et al
as 1:2013cv00958
Plaintiff: PETER BORMUTH
Defendant: ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD, TINKA G. HYDE and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of Honolulu v. EPA, et al
as 10-72575
Petitioner: CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
DC Water and Sewer Authority v. Lisa Jackson
as 08-1251
Petitioner: DC Water and Sewer Authority
Respondent: Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, EPA, Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, EPA, Environmental Protection Agency and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., Friends of the Earth, Inc. and Sierra Club

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?