Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Epic Office Solutions LLC v. Epson America, Inc.
as 1:2023cv11179
Plaintiff:
Epic Office Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Original Supply Inc.
as 1:2021cv03451
Plaintiff:
Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
Original Supply Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Summer v. Seiko Epson Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv06837
Defendant:
Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Summer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. FTrade Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05036
Plaintiff:
Epson Portland Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
Wei Feng Li, FTrade Inc., GPC Trading Co., Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. E-Z Ink Inc.
as 1:2018cv01338
Plaintiff:
Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson Portland Inc. and Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
E-Z Ink Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al
as 6:2010cv06710
Plaintiff:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Seiko Epson Corp. , U.S. Epson, Inc. , Epson America, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Epson Portland, Inc. , U.S. Epson, Inc. , Seiko Epson Corp. and others
Counter_defendant:
RAH Color Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Juan v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan, Jose Juan, Jose Juan and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
