Cases 31 - 38 of 38
VETANG v. EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01313
Defendant:
BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC and EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC
Plaintiff:
WISAT VETANG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bradley v. Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05988
Plaintiff:
Constance Bradley
Defendant:
Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, The Northland Group, Inc. and Vision Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Benson v. Encore Receivables Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
Roger Benson
Defendant:
Encore Receivables Management, Inc., Josh E. McHughes , McHughes Law Firm, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ballesteros v. Global Credit & Collection Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04788
Plaintiff:
Jose Ballesteros
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corporation and Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shipp v. Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04468
Plaintiff:
Bill Shipp
Defendant:
Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, National Action Financial Services, Inc. and Vision Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sarian-Frazer v. Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04463
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sarian-Frazer
Defendant:
Hilco Receivables, LLC, n/k/a Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Aargon Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Conner v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. et al
as 1:2010cv03006
Plaintiff:
Catherine Conner
Defendant:
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. and Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
