Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tina Neville, et al v. Charlotte Burrows
as 24-5103
Plaintiff:
Tina Neville, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and Rachel E. Bennet, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
Charlotte A. Burrows, in Her Official Capacity as Chair of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin Akerman v. MSPB, et al
as 23-5309
Plaintiff:
Martin Akerman
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Special Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al
as 23-5239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, (NAACP) and others
AKERMAN v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
