Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Musacco v. Walden, et al.
as 1:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
Beau J Musacco
Defendant:
Mark Elliot Walden, Gregg Marcantel, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Bravo et al
as 1:2013cv00825
Petitioner:
Anthony Wallace
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holt v. LNU et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jimmy J. Holt
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Cathy Catanach, FNU Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ysasi v. Bravo et al
as 1:2013cv00654
Petitioner:
Peter Mendez Ysasi
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chand v. Bravo
as 13-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAREND CHAND
Defendant - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Wright v. Bravo
as 1:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Shavis D Wright
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruppert v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Ruppert
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Gregg Marcantel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bravo, et al
as 12-2187
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Chand v. Bravo et al
as 1:2012cv01044
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Narend Chand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Napeahi v. Bravo et al
as 1:2012cv01042
Plaintiff:
William Napeahi
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility and Silver Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
