Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
702) 388-2968 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Independent American Party of Nevada et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2010cv01477
Plaintiff:
Gale Carlton, Tony Dane, Christopher Hansen and others
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ayala-Villanueva v. Holder
as 2:2009cv01272
Petitioner:
Wilsonis Ayala-Villanueva
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nepomuceno et al v. Holder
as 2:2009cv00265
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Navaro Nepomuceno and Jacqueline Gallas Nepomuceno
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
