Cases 51 - 60 of 117
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
CARROLL COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
MARTIN v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01082
Plaintiff:
JEAROME MARTIN
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2012cv01079
Petitioner:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CIACCI v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2012cv01083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2012cv01078
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01066
Petitioner:
BERNARD A. WALKER
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TELEMAQUE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01087
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TELEMAQUE
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARPENTER v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01050
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. CARPENTER
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABRAMYAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2012cv01064
Plaintiff:
NINA ABRAMYAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
