Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Devin Kugler v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN M. KUGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Program Director, ERIC KUNKLE, Assistant Program Director and JAMES MCCURRY, Security Director
MacKintosh et al v. Kunkle et al
as 4:2021cv04034
Defendant:
Carolyn Gurski, Lynn Shelton and Eric Kunkle
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh and Raven Banner Kindred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackel v. Pennock et al
as 4:2021cv04026
Defendant:
Heather Hymes, Jeremie Seymour, Paula Lodge and others
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv04200
Defendant:
Dr Shan Jumper, Christina Woods, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mancell v. Kunkle et al
as 4:2020cv04174
Defendant:
Juan Perez, Marie A Durant, Curtis Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mancell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kugler v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04168
Defendant:
. Chaukley, . Logdston, Gregg Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04167
Defendant:
Eric Kunkle and Gregg Scott
Plaintiff:
Brian Christopher Anderson and Harvie Dawayn Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04065
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
Gregg Scott and Eric Kunkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Rauner et al
as 4:2016cv04089
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
Bruce Rauner, James T Dimas, James Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackel v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregory M Bassi, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
