Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Hjalmar Rodriguez v. Edward Burnside
as 20-11218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ and HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD H. BURNSIDE, MARY GORE, Nurse,GDCP, DAVID BUTTS, Medical Director, GDCP and others
WOOD v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, SAMUEL ANDREWS, QUINTON RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SELLERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14020
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC SELLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Sellers et al
as 1:2019cv04839
Respondent:
Eric Sellers and T. Bobbit
Petitioner:
Jarrett Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LLOYD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00353
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant:
LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00227
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MOSS
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, Clay Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
CLAY NIX, JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ELIJAH FAISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DOTSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, CLAY NIX and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAMMELL v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00204
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TRAMMELL
Defendant:
WARDEN ERIC SELLERS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
