Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Star Colbert v. Dougan
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
STAR COLBERT, ASSENAGON CREDIT SUBDEBT AND COCO, AXIOM EUROPEAN FINANCIAL DEBT FUND LIMITED, Individually and on Behalf of Other Credit Suisse Group AG AT1 Bondholders and others
Defendant:
BRADY W. DOUGAN, ERIC VARVEL, JAMES L. AMINE and others
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv11138
Plaintiff:
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L. Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Schur v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv10944
Plaintiff:
Peter Schur
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Star Colbert et al v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv07297
Plaintiff:
Star Colbert, Assenagon Credit SubDebt and CoCo, Axiom Lux SICAV and others
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L Amine and others
Interested Party:
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Star Colbert et al v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv04582
Plaintiff:
Star Colbert, Assenagon Credit SubDebt and CoCo, Axiom Lux SICAV and others
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L. Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lawtone-Bowles v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04813
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lawtone-Bowles
Defendant:
Richard E. Thornburgh, Bradley W. Dougan, John G. Popp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stevenson v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04458
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Stevenson
Defendant:
Richard E Thornburgh, Bradley W Dougan, John G Popp and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert S Shafir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
