Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Heslen v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Nicolette Dawn Heslen
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brian Belleque, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Endicott-Orren v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00564
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Anthony Ross, John/Jane Doe, Assistant Superintendent of Security and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany Endicott-Orren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Jane/John Doe, Anthony Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabtree v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01291
Defendant:
Michael Gower, State of Oregon, Edgar Mickels and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Mercedes Crabtree and Mercedes Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01195
Plaintiff:
Ms Maria Molina and Maria Molina
Defendant:
et al., Collette Peters, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culley v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00926
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Culley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweeney v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brelin v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00672
Defendant:
Dr Don Dravis, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Brelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomes v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio, Joe DeCamp and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Dr Don Dravis, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
