Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ernest Hicks v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 20-36029
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign (non-Washington incorporated) banking institution and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., a foreign (non-Washington incorporated) corporation
Defendant:
TREASURY BANK, N.A., a foreign (non-Washington incorporated) banking institution, DOES, 1-10 and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP OF WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST CLARK HICKS
USA v. Ernest Clark
as 12-2627
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST CLARK
Ernest Clark v. Patricia Gorence
as 11-2691
Petitioner:
ERNEST CLARK
Respondent:
PATRICIA J. GORENCE
Ernest Clark v. Patricia Gorence
as 11-2626
Petitioner:
ERNEST CLARK
Respondent:
PATRICIA J. GORENCE
USA v. Ernest Clark
as 11-1965
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST CLARK
American Federation of Governm, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 08-3632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMER FEDR OF GOVT EMPL LOCAL 1904, JOHN R. POITRAS, individually and in his capacity as President of the American Federation of Government Employees - Local 1904, MARIA A. LASALA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. GATES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, PETER GEREN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, CLAUDE M. KICKLIGHTER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America and others
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES- LOCAL 1904 et al v. GATES et al
as 3:2007cv04548
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES- LOCAL 1904, JOHN R. POITRAS, MARIA A. LASALA and others
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, PETER GEREN, DAVID M. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
