Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Flowers v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Defendant:
Major Carter, Capt. C. L. James, Sgt. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernest Flowers v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 21-10422
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNEST M. FLOWERS
Flowers v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv20280
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flowers v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Mark Inch, G. Grioung, Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv20504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv20315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ernest Flowers v. Florida Department of Corr., et al
as 17-13529
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST M. FLOWERS
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Flowers et al v. State Attorney Office of Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2017cv20759
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers and Steven L. Pinder
Defendant:
State Attorney Office of Miami-Dade County, 11th Judicial Circuit Court and Third District Court Of Appeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ernest Flowers
as 14-13761
Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST M. FLOWERS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Flowers v. Tucker et al
as 2:2013cv14011
Plaintiff:
Ernest M Flowers, III
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, Thomas Reid, McDew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
