Cases 31 - 40 of 183
HETSBERGER v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2021cv09322
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
MORTIMER HETSBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
REEVES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv09073
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, XYZ CORPORATION, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALEXANDER v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "EECF" et al
as 2:2021cv04580
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF ESSEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIG v. JOHN AND JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CRAIG
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY WARDEN and JOHN AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2021cv01025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3 CORRECTIONAL OFFICER(S), ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE #1 FOOD POLICYMAKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2020cv15606
Petitioner:
KHALEE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELTON v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT, et al.
as 2:2020cv13344
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, BUREAU OF NARCOTICS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESTER v. ESSEX COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2020cv12467
Plaintiff:
MELVIN HESTER
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY POLICE DEPT. and ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2020cv10333
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04718
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SGT. GUIDO, DR. LIONEL ANICETTE and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS W. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
