Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor v. Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party and Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party
Defendant:
Nation of Islam and Louis Farrakhan Estate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Texas, Richard King Estate, San Houston Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Adaja Madison and Estate of Jermelle Madison
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Naphcare Inc., Angela Brandenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gahr v. Marion County et al
as 6:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Gena Gahr personal representative for the Estate of Matthew Gahr and Gena Gahr
Defendant:
Marion County, Joe Kast, Tad Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tarabochia v. City of Seaside, Oregon et al
as 3:2016cv01603
Defendant:
City of Seaside, Oregon, Clatsop County, Oregon, Estate of Jason Gooding and others
Plaintiff:
Loren Christopher Tarabochia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thunderwolf v. Buffett et al
as 6:2015cv01942
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Real Estate Home Services, Warren Buffett, Facebook and others
Plaintiff:
Nakoda Thunderwolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ward et al v. Corizon Inc et al
as 3:2013cv02087
Defendant:
C. Allen, J. Barnes, J. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andre Ward and Emma Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Cochran Ph.D. et al
as 6:2012cv02114
Defendant:
Clinical and Forensic Psych Assoc., John B. Cochran Ph.D. and Estate of John B. Cochran
Plaintiff:
Roger Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
