Cases 11 - 20 of 119
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE and JAMES THOMAS ENGLISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE and JAMES THOMAS ENGLISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TONELLI et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. TONELLI, WILLIAM BENNETT, THERESA BENNETT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
ADAMS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
LEE ADAMS, NEAL AGARWAL, PERI ALKAS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Sheller v. HHS
as 23-1746
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHAD SHELLER, as Personal Representative of the estate of DANIEL ELIAS SHELLER
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
