Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Wooldridge v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv06092
Plaintiff:
Amey Wooldridge
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderberg v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv06100
Plaintiff:
Peter K. Anderberg
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentz v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05018
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terri Bentz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Genia Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv05068
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hall and Jeremy Hall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanifl et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00527
Plaintiff:
William Hanifl and Julie Hanifl
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Madenna K. Dorgan and Richard Dorgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06099
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Keith Foster and Kimberly Fromm Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilstrap v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03160
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gilstrap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05006
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Cynthia S. Thompson and Terry L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
