Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Prince v. The Government of the People's
as 19-2279
Defendant:
The Government of The People's Republic of China, Ethiopian Airlines, Yefang Construction Private Limited and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Gang Xiao, Balehager Ayalew, BDMA Engineering PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leslie F. Prince and Prince Services International Inc., DBA PSI Consultants
In re Air Cargo Shipping Servi
as 11-5464
Plaintiff / Appellant:
One of more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3993, Alluvion Inc. v. ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al.,, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v. Air France-KLM et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG and others
Plaintiff:
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3985, Harry Okabe Flowers v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3976, Lynn Culver v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Thule, Inc., EL AL Israel Airlines, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co. v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant:
Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG and others
Debtor:
In re: Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Edem v. Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise
as 11-3770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edmund Orok Edem
Defendant:
Ethiopian Insurance Corporation, Ethiopian Government, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and John and Jane Does
Defendant - Appellee:
Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise
Edem v. Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise et al
as 1:2008cv02597
Plaintiff:
Edmund Orok Edem
Defendant:
Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise, Ethiopian Insurance Corporation and Ethiopian Government
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
