Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tanner v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Tabetha A. Tanner
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KUBATBEK KYZY v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2019cv00885
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
KUBATBEK KYZY GULINA and GULINA KUBATBEK KYZY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Rad et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv02263
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review/Board of Immigration Appeals, Jeffery Boyles, Roger Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rad and Reynard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PULOTOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv06067
Plaintiff:
NEMAT PULOTOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AHMEDOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv04976
Plaintiff:
ABDURASHID AHMEDOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
AHMED v. FREDERICK et al
as 2:2016cv01273
Plaintiff:
ZULAIKHA AHMED
Defendant:
KENT J. FREDERICK, STEVEN MORLEY and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LLANO v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 2:2009cv02981
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ADOLFO LLANO
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR UNITED STATES and WARDEN-S.C.I. HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
