Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Parish of Cameron v. BP America Prod
as 23-30422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Parish of Cameron
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, ex rel, on behalf of Jeff Landry and State of Louisiana, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Office of Coastal Management, on behalf of Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
BP America Production Company, Chevron U.S.A. Incorporated, own capacity & as successor in interest, on behalf of California Company, Shell Oil Company and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA
as 23-30364
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company, and Gulf Oil Corporation, Shell Offshore, Incorporated, Shell Oil Company and others
Plaquemines Parish v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, Ex Rel Jeff Landry and Louisiana State, Through Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, L.L.C., Named as Successor in Interest to The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Getty Oil Company, Texas E&P Incorporated, Tide Water Associated Oil Company, Tidewater Oil Company and Texaco Producing, Incorporated and BP America Production Company, As Successor in Interest to Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Plaquemines Prsh v. BP America Prod
as 23-30294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
BP America Production Company, As Successor in Interest to Amoco Production Company, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, L.P., Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company and Gulf Oil Corporation and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated and Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30225
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel. Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Atlantic Richfield Company, Chevron USA, Incorporated and others
Jefferson Parish v. Exxon Mobil
as 23-30227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, Ex Rel Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, Ex Rel. Jeff Landry Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Named as Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation, The Superior Oil Company, and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, L.L.C., Named as Successor in Interest to The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Texaco, Incorporated and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. Exxon Mobil
as 23-30188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, as successor in interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, ConocoPhillips Company, as successor in interest to General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Oil Company, Phillips Petrleum company, U.S. Oil of Louisiana, Incorporated, Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil corporation and The California Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
